Tuesday 9 October 2007

အၾကမ္းဖက္သမားနဲ႔ လက္နက္ကိုင္ ေတာ္လွန္ေရး

ဒီေနရာမွာ ကၽြန္ေတာ္ နည္းနည္းေလာက္ ေျပာပါရေစ။ လက္နက္ကိုင္ၿပီး တိုက္ခိုက္တယ္ ဆိုတာနဲ႔ အၾကမ္းဖက္တယ္လို႔ လူေတြက ယူဆတတ္တဲ့ သေဘာကိုပါ။ ကၽြန္ေတာ္တို႔ ေသေသခ်ာခ်ာ အေျခအေနေတြကို ျပန္ေတြးၾကည့္ပါ။

လက္နက္ကိုင္တိုင္း အၾကမ္းဖက္တာ ဟုတ္၊ မဟုတ္ ဆိုတာ စဥ္းစားၾကည့္ရပါမယ္။ အၾကမ္းဖက္တိုင္းလည္း လက္နက္ကိုင္ စရာလိုခ်င္မွ လိုပါလိမ့္မယ္။ ဒီေတာ့ လက္နက္ကိုင္လိုက္တာနဲ႔ အၾကမ္းဖက္သမား ျဖစ္သြားၿပီလား ဆိုတာကို ကၽြန္ေတာ္တို႔ ေတြးၾကည့္ရပါလိမ့္မယ္။

ေယဘံုယ် သေဘာတရားနဲ႔ကေတာ့ လက္နက္ကိုင္ရင္ အၾကမ္းဖက္ရတာ ပိုလြယ္ပါတယ္။ ဒါေပမယ့္ လက္နက္ကိုင္တိုင္း အၾကမ္းဖက္ သမား မဟုတ္ဘူးဆိုတာေတာ့ အားလံုး သေဘာေပါက္ထားသင့္တယ္လို႔ ထင္ပါတယ္။

အခု လက္နက္ကိုင္ အၾကမ္းဖက္ေနေသာ၊ အျပစ္မဲ့ လူေတြနဲ႔ သံဃာေတာ္ေတြကို သတ္ေနေသာ၊ ဗုဒၶသာသနာကို ဖ်က္ဆီးေနေသာ နအဖ လူတစ္စုကိုသာ အၾကမ္းဖက္သမားလို႔ နာမည္တပ္ေခၚသင့္ၿပီး၊ နအဖကို လက္နက္ကိုင္ၿပီး ျပန္တိုက္ၾကဖို႔ တတ္ႏိုင္သေလာက္ စုစည္းထားတဲ့ အင္အားစုေတြကို လက္နက္ကိုင္ အၾကမ္းဖက္ သမားဆိုတာထက္ လက္နက္ကိုင္ ေတာ္လွန္ေရး သမားေတြ လို႔ ေျပာင္းၿပီး ေခၚေစခ်င္ပါတယ္။


ကိုထိုက္
..............................................................................................................

From the The Times of London:
UN staff were thrown into panic over the weekend after Burmese police and diplomats entered its offices in Rangoon and demanded hard drives from its computers.
The discs contain information that could help the dictatorship to identify key members of the opposition movement, many of whom have gone underground. UN staff spent much of the weekend deleting information.
The stream of dramatic images of tens of thousands of monks parading through Rangoon inspired condemnation of the Government across the world. On Saturday, demonstrations denouncing the regime were held as far apart as Sydney, Singapore, London and Washington.
Many of the images were disseminated through e-mail by Burmese bloggers who used software to outwit attempts to block them. Even after the Government shut down the internet altogether ten days ago, photographs and films were smuggled out on tiny storage drives and memory cards by travelers to Thailand.
Some of the demonstrators have reportedly been arrested after being identified in footage of the rallies. The junta is going after the UN, in the belief that its officials allowed images to be transmitted through their own internet links – channeled via satellite phones and therefore less vulnerable to interference by the authorities.
“It’s part of this systematic, repressive response to the demonstrations,” said a Western diplomat in Rangoon. “We’ve seen them focus on people who directly participated in the demonstrations by picking them up through the videos Then they’ve arrested people with cameras containing images of the demos. And now they’re trying to track down the means that were used to send them out.”

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

wow... I wonder what the UN is going to do about this raid...

Unknown said...

I hope that U.N wipes the dishes clean, because information can be retrieved even if they are deleted.

Anonymous said...

and it can also be grabbed from the ISP service (satelite), being in Asia it is probably a sub-service easy for the junta to manipulate.

Helz Cuppleditch said...

It is disgusting.

Helz Cuppleditch said...

HERE'S A NEAR-VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT FROM THE DAILY PRESS MEETING FOR THE UN SECRETARY GENERAL SPOKESPERSON AND OFFICE, FROM YESTERDAY.

Question: This is on Myanmar. There have been reports that security forces went to a UN office in Rangoon. Could you tell something about this? And they requested to get the computer material.



Spokesperson: The information we got this morning, in fact, a little earlier, before I came in, no authorities entered any UN premises, no written request to do so or to present any permits have been received by the UN offices in Yangon. What happened this weekend is... this is what I got from there: security forces accompanied by representatives of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs were present at the Trader Hotel, which houses several UN offices and other international agencies, as well as businesses. By the way, UNDP and the resident coordinator are not in that hotel. A United Nations official asked the authorities for the purpose of the visit and they responded that they were there to see the permits issued to the United Nations to use satellite equipment. However, this was never pursued, as I said, by any letter or by any request, and no authorities entered the UN premises.

Fabien said...

If this is true, the UN really needs to step up a gear and stop being a doormat.

Juila of the Crustish said...

it's so strange to imagine that people finally care about Burma. For awhile nobody even knew it existed.

Unknown said...

Burma showed the world the juxstaposition of an extreme regime and the purest loving kindness.

The utter shame of the whole aspect of the crisis in Burma is, in my opinion, that the arms trade and the belief in a military, in the first place, exists.

Too, ethical business dealing and a sense of corporate accountability for the greater good of all of humanity must become a world-wide standard. The sharing of wealth is not paramount in sentiment among most individuals . But there will always be greed?


How do you change human nature? Furthermore, do you believe that human nature can be changed?


Few among us can be so self-disciplined and certainly, mizzima is difficult to embrace.

When we no longer have to rely upon saying, "I'm sorry", because there will be no incidence arising for those words to be said, then we will be on the road to becoming truly conscious of what we, as people of the world, think, act,and speak to one another. Then possibly, we can look forward to a world where there will be no need for enmity to exist. Obviously, one must learn the value of sharing.

So, look to oneself for the answer to change. Each one of our daily decisions depends upon correctness....we are all born with our own karma....

Burma shows us loving kindness but at great cost of human life. And because of tecnology, that is how the world is finally noticing Burma....people are witnessing a revolution unfold and the regime in Burma will end.

The people will win.

What they decide upon and if they can decide upon anything will be another matter.

Don't forget that the original union only existed to garner support for independence from Britain. It may well be that these peoples will again prefer to have their own sovereignty and perhaps there will be those who prefer to be in a union. Whatever the case, I know they will agree to decide what is best for each, at least that is what I hope.